beranda.net logo

beranda > corner > why the trade deficit may not loom so large

In addition to an article in BusinessWeek June 7, 2004 edition by Laura D'Andrea Tyson, this is another article from McKinsey Consulting about why US citizens and government should not worry about its high deficit. Here I put the quotes of some of the key points of the article from McKinsey. Just as usual, McKinsey gives us a nice article to read...(But, I am so sorry that I am too lazy to paraphrase the quotes...)


A Silver Lining in the US Trade Deficit

Original Article By Diana Farrell, Sacha Ghai, and Tim Shavers (March 2005)


Summary/Quotes

1. "The record-breaking US current-account deficit has prompted calls from protectionists to slow the flood of imports. This response may be understandable, but it is still misguided, given that a large and growing share of the deficit simply reflects the international reach—and success—of the strongest US companies."

"When a US carmaker manufactures vehicles in Mexico, it sells many of them to Mexican consumers; the resulting profits appear in the current account as a positive income flow.2 In addition, these companies use technologies and components produced in the United States, thereby lifting US exports. At the same time, vehicles assembled abroad and shipped back to the United States count as imports, despite the fact that they are produced by US companies."

2. "Instead of adopting protectionist legislation to 'correct' trade imbalances, it would make more sense for the government to update the way it calculates the trade balance."

"The current account takes a residency-based view of trade—that is, it measures the physical flow of goods and services across a nation's borders, regardless of the nationality or the ownership of parties on either side of the transaction. In the 1940s, when national balance-of-payments accounting methodologies were created, few companies had operations outside the home country—imports were goods produced by foreign companies, exports by domestic ones."

"This categorization no longer holds true. A growing number of companies have expanded abroad, setting up foreign affiliates. In the national balance of payments, any exchange of goods, services, or income between a foreign affiliate and its parent company, other US companies, or consumers is counted as an export, an import, or an income flow."

3. "In the light of these factors, the view that today's record current-account deficit reflects a weak economy and spells doom for the nation is simplistic.The revenues of the foreign affiliates of US companies totaled some $2.7 trillion in 2002—roughly three times the value of exports from the United States "