D. Manggala (October 2, 2004)
There are several symptoms that show a
firm’s value chain is dysfunctional:
1. There is a chronic silo mentality within the
firm.
This silo mentality makes all processes run slowly and
in a sequential cycle times; no collaboration or smooth
integration among teams. It happens because each department
only cares about its own box; for instance, engineering
department designs a product that no consumer wants it,
purchasing department keeps changing its vendors, marketing
department creates unrealistic forecast and operation department
is too busy in fire-fighting mode (e.g. reactive maintenance).
In addition, in this kind of company, the organization
structure is usually a very traditional-hierarchical model,
a model that has bold boundaries among departments. With
this kind of organization, there is no open communication
culture in it.. When a management’s effort is not
yielding the desired result, everyone often will be too
afraid to confront top management with evidence that things
is not going as planned.
2. There are turf-wars everywhere in the company.
Because of the silo mentality, tremendous time and energy
spent into defending one’s individual performance.
For example, if a manager is developing a program/project,
there might be some big questions from other managers regarding
the project market/business perspective. In a horizontally
dysfunctional company, that kind of questions could create
a war between two managers. Most of the time, they are not
arguing about financial/business objectives but rather blaming
each other because no one wants to look bad.
3. Sub-optimized of organization.
In a horizontally dysfuntional company, there is one word
missing: SYNERGY.
Each function tries to do what was best for its own performance,
not the performance of the company as a whole. For instance,
the people in production department maybe tries to show
the best performance (sometimes by "cooking" the
production numbers) or project department tries to impress
others by keeping itself busy spending huge amount of budget
in some projects that are never finished. Many departments
announces each saving initiative's success.
But the performance of the company as a whole: increasing
cost, decreasing production, and loosing market share.
4. There is enemy-within syndrome.
The boxes among functions makes a big gap between one department
to another; there is always “us” versus “them”
in every good initiative.
Every improvement effort would be seen as a conspiracy
to make other people looks bad. Quality improvement might
be seen as a "flavor of the month." Operation
efficiency improvement might be seen by employees as the
management's way to cut head counts. There will always be
suspicions.
If you are familiar with at least one of the above symptoms,
then there is an opportunity for improvement :)
Reference:
Ashkenas, R.et. al. “Beyond Turf and Territory”
Understanding the Value Chain GRBUS-510 Supplemental Readings.
Summer 2004